← All projects
PRJ-02Active buildUMD LOOP · University Rover Challenge

A 3-DOF robotic wrist,
engineered from zero.

A concentric-geared ball wrist and custom gearbox for a competition rover arm — driven to a 15:1 reduction and roughly 30% lighter across ten design iterations, then machined, printed, and assembled by hand.

3DOF
Degrees of freedom
15:1
Gear reduction
−30%
Mass reduction
$250
of a $500 budget
The fully built 3-DOF wrist and manipulator assembly on the workbench
Final assembly — three drive motors feeding the concentric wrist
scroll ▾
02Proof of motion

Bringing the wrist to life

Renders prove intent. This proves function — all three axes articulating under motor power.

Live · powered articulation

Bench test — three-axis articulation under power

03The challenge

Mass at the end of an arm is the enemy. Every gram the wrist adds multiplies the torque demand through every joint upstream — so the wrist had to deliver three degrees of freedom and a 15:1 reduction in the smallest, lightest, most serviceable package possible.

Kinematics

Three degrees of freedom from a compact concentric ball-wrist layout.

Torque

15:1 reduction to drive the wrist under load at the arm's end.

Packaging

Three gearmotors and three encoders inside one short housing.

Environment

Survive the Utah desert — fine, abrasive Mars-analog dust everywhere.

Serviceability

Field-swappable motors without tearing the whole gearbox down.

Budget & shop

$500 subsystem cap, built on student-shop CNC, water jet, and FDM.

Very early CAD iteration of the gearbox — oversized and heavy
04Iteration 01 · the first attempt

Too much of everything

The first architecture worked on paper and almost nowhere else. It was oversized and heavy, packed with material chasing rigidity the joint never needed, and it interfaced poorly with both the arm and the wrist it was meant to drive.

  • Over-built for stiffness — mass with no payback
  • Large footprint fought the end-of-arm packaging budget
  • Weak, ad-hoc interfaces to the wrist and arm clamp
Intermediate CAD iteration of the gearbox — lighter but unfinished
05Iteration · cutting the fat

Lighter, tighter — still not done

Each review with senior engineers stripped another layer of excess. Lightening pockets opened up the structural plates, the footprint shrank, and the packaging started to resolve — but the gear train and interfaces still needed real refinement.

Ten-plus iterations, each reviewed and measured. The discipline of rapid, critiqued revision is what turned a heavy concept into a flight-worthy mechanism.

06The final architecture

Ten iterations, one clean package

Helical and compound gearing to 15:1, standoff construction for repeatable assembly, an integrated dust cover, and roughly 30% less mass than where it started.

Final gearbox CAD assembly with half the dust cover cut away to reveal internals
Final assembly — dust cover cut away to expose the gear train

Helical gearing

~10% better load distribution and smoother engagement than spur.

Compound reduction

Stacked stages reach 15:1 while keeping the package short.

Standoff construction

Replaced bolt-and-spacer stacks for repeatable assembly.

07Inside the mechanism

Concentric power transmission

A section cut through the wrist's center plane. Three drive paths run concentrically through a single axis — the densest packaging problem on the arm, solved in one nested gear train.

Cross-sectional CAD view showing the concentric gearing and internal architecture
  1. 01

    Concentric output

    Three coaxial drive paths share one axis, feeding the wrist's degrees of freedom without splaying the package.

  2. 02

    Helical stage

    Angled teeth spread the load across more contact and run quieter under torque.

  3. 03

    Compound reduction

    Reductions stacked in series hit 15:1 while keeping the gearbox short enough to live at the arm's end.

  4. 04

    Bearing interfaces

    Located, preloaded interfaces keep the concentric shafts true under bending load.

08From CAD to hardware

I cut the metal myself

The design didn't stop at a render. I cut the structural plates from 6061 aluminum on the water jet, CNC-machined the precision interfaces, and FDM-printed the housing and dust cover — three physical prototype iterations on the way to a built assembly.

Material
6061-T6
Process
Water jet
Prototypes
3 builds
Aluminum gearbox plates freshly cut on the water jet
6061 plates straight off the water jet
CAD of the modular bottom plate with detachable motor mounts
09Designing for assembly

Built to be serviced in the field

Each drive motor rides on its own quick-release plate rather than a single monolithic base. A motor can be swapped between runs without disassembling the gearbox — modularity bought at almost no mass cost.

  • Per-motor detachable mounting plates
  • Field-swappable drives without a full teardown
  • Standardized hardware across the assembly
The finished printed dust cover installed on the built wrist
Printed dust cover — precision fit on the built assembly
10The finishing touches

Sealed against the desert

URC runs in the Utah desert, a Mars analog where fine grit migrates into any open mechanism. A printed dust cover seals the concentric gear train against the debris that would otherwise accelerate wear and jam the wrist mid-task — sized for a clean, precise fit on the built hardware.

11Outcome

A flight-worthy wrist, half the budget, a third lighter

15:1
Reduction achieved
−30%
Mass vs. first design
$250
Cost — half the budget
10+
Reviewed iterations

What this demonstrates

Gear train designDFM / DFAWeight optimizationPackaging under constraintSolidWorksWater jet · CNC · FDMIterative design reviewHands-on fabrication

What I took from it

A working system is the goal, but a manufacturable, serviceable one is the job. The operating environment is a design input — the dust cover is as much a part of the gearbox as the gears — and rapid, critiqued iteration is what compounds a rough concept into something that flies.